What supports the finding
- Two datasets can be traced to identifiable publishers
- The relevant figures can be reproduced from the published tables
- The broad direction of growth is supported
Evidence assurance
Illustrative Aperture Reliance Finding
A complete example of how Aperture separates support, weakness, consequence and the next verification step.
Reliance finding
Partially supported
The central market-growth claim is supported by two traceable datasets. However, the claimed rate of growth depends on a selective baseline, three cited articles derive from the same underlying estimate, and material counter-indicators were omitted. The claim may be used only with qualification and should not presently support the proposed investment assumption without further verification.
What weakens the finding
- The stated rate depends on a selective baseline year
- Three apparent sources repeat one estimate
- Counter-indicators were omitted
- The forecast method is not fully disclosed
Decision consequence
Use only with explicit qualification. Do not rely on the headline rate as the sole basis for the investment assumption.
What would reduce uncertainty
Obtain an independent dataset, apply a consistent baseline, inspect the forecast method and test the omitted counter-indicators.
This is an illustrative example, not a client result, certification, investment opinion or guarantee.
Three-part interpretation
The finding separates fact, confidence and reliance
Factual status
Partially supported. Two datasets support the central direction of the claim, while several derivative citations do not add independent confirmation.
Evidential confidence
Moderate confidence. Material support exists, but the baseline choice and omitted counter-indicators limit confidence.
Reliance status
Use only with material qualification. The record is not sufficient to support the proposed investment assumption without further verification.
A claim may be factually plausible and still be unsafe to rely upon for a high-consequence decision.
Know what may responsibly be relied upon.
Start with the decision, claim or material that needs independent evidence assessment.