For Transaction Lawyers
Use Aperture for factual verification without displacing legal judgment or legal advice.
Transaction counsel may identify a factual dependency that matters to legal strategy or transaction risk but requires independent evidence review rather than legal interpretation.
Where the factual boundary appears
Situations where specialist evidence review may fit
A chronology or representation needs independent testing.
The legal team wants the factual record organised before specialist legal analysis.
A public-source question should be documented with contradictions and limitations visible.
Relevant public guides
Start with the client problem
Test a representation
Open the guide →Review the public-source record
Open the guide →See how Aperture works alongside counsel
Open the guide →Your role remains yours
Aperture is designed to complement, not replace, the professional adviser.
You retain the client relationship and your core mandate. Aperture accepts only the agreed evidence-review scope and does not become the client's transaction lawyers service provider. Where a matter requires legal, financial, tax, technical or other regulated specialist judgment, that dependency remains explicit.