For Search Funds
Bring independent evidence review into acquisition work without building another internal function.
Searchers need to move efficiently, but a single unsupported factual proposition can distort an otherwise sound acquisition process.
Where the factual boundary appears
Situations where specialist evidence review may fit
The searcher needs to separate repeated information from genuine independent corroboration.
A public record creates uncertainty that ordinary screening has not resolved.
A defined evidence question should be tested before committing more diligence time or capital.
Relevant public guides
Start with the client problem
Verify the assumption
Open the guide →Test the representation
Open the guide →Run the verification-need check
Open the guide →Your role remains yours
Aperture is designed to complement, not replace, the professional adviser.
You retain the client relationship and your core mandate. Aperture accepts only the agreed evidence-review scope and does not become the client's search funds service provider. Where a matter requires legal, financial, tax, technical or other regulated specialist judgment, that dependency remains explicit.