1 · Human review
We assess fit, lawful purpose, jurisdiction, conflicts and capacity.
Written-first · one question is enough to begin
Send one material question, the decision it affects and the real deadline. No call is required to begin a standard Aperture matter. A person reviews fit before any broader intake.
Small first decision
Start with the single fact you do not want to accept without independent verification. If it is suitable, Aperture can scope a Target Facts Check, Borrower Facts Check, Dispute Evidence Check or another proportionate written product.
Written-first. Email, LinkedIn, this form and other written client communication are the normal starting routes. A telephone call is optional, not a requirement.
This first contact is deliberately short. Do not send evidence or sensitive records yet.
Your enquiry reference
Generating…
Keep this reference in future correspondence.
If your mail app does not open, copy this text and email it to info@apertureforensic.com.
What happens next
We assess fit, lawful purpose, jurisdiction, conflicts and capacity.
If the matter may fit, we request the additional scope and regulatory information that is actually needed.
Accepted work proceeds only after scope, fee, timing, responsibilities and terms are agreed.
Briefly explain what you are about to rely on, why it matters and what could happen if it is wrong. A real person will review the question and the decision it affects.
Every enquiry receives a fit review. If Aperture can assist, we will explain the appropriate next step. If another specialist is better placed, we will say so clearly.
Before a formal scope
A suitable matter normally has a clear proposition or bounded set of related questions, a factual issue that can be tested, evidence that is available or reasonably obtainable, a meaningful decision consequence and a scope that stays within Aperture's professional boundaries.
If those conditions are not met, Aperture may narrow, defer or decline the matter rather than manufacture a finding.